Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed a trilateral summit with US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the November 18–19 APEC summit in Shenzhen to discuss ending the war in Ukraine, according to a Wall Street Journal account relayed by multiple outlets [5][9][22]. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed that the subject of a hypothetical meeting was raised but said no specific proposals or agreements were discussed [5][8][21]. A senior US official said Trump had not agreed but could be open to the idea [5][9]. The proposal was revived in an October 9 phone call between Putin and Trump that also produced a US agreement to purchase Russian diesel, after a similar three-way meeting had already been discussed in a September call between the two leaders [22][32][40].

Peskov stressed that a final settlement is impossible without the participation of someone in Kyiv prepared to take responsibility [8][21][37]. Russian presidential aide Yuri Ushakov said the initiative for such talks should come from Beijing if Trump confirms his participation [43]. Putin has repeatedly ruled out meeting Zelensky until a final peace deal is ready [37].

Trump told reporters he is open to a trilateral meeting but framed it around denuclearization rather than Ukraine, saying the discussion would cover nuclear weapons and trade [6][24]. He defended his decision to waive sanctions on Russia and purchase Russian diesel as necessary to keep Moscow at the negotiating table [7][34]. Trump accused Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky of not wanting to end the war and suggested it may be time for someone else to conduct negotiations on Ukraine's behalf [16][19][29]. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent accused Zelensky of posing a "false dilemma" by tying the end of the war to a Ukrainian victory [19]. Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed there have been talks about a meeting but said he did not know whether it had been finalized [15][20].

Zelensky warned that Ukraine cannot survive if the United States sides with Russia and accused Washington of taking steps to push Ukraine toward capitulation, citing slowed Starlink service and delayed Patriot missile deliveries [7][9][11][32]. He offered to halt strikes on Russian oil refineries in exchange for US Patriot missile supplies [2]. Zelensky said Ukraine received no advance warning from partners before Russian ballistic missile strikes on Kyiv that hit more than ten energy facilities and left 550,000 households without power [25][28]. Rubio denied any pause in intelligence sharing with Kyiv and urged Zelensky to focus on ending the war [25][28].

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha rejected the Russia-US-China format, saying a trilateral meeting of Ukraine, the US and Russia could end the war sooner whereas a Russia-China-US meeting would "encourage Putin to continue this war" [8][20][21]. Sybiha called Putin a war criminal rather than a global leader and said Russia is a global problem rather than a global power [26][45]. A coalition of more than thirty Ukrainian human rights organizations stated that any agreements about Ukraine without its direct participation contradict international law and the right of the Ukrainian people to determine their own future [49].

European governments insisted that any settlement must respect Ukraine's territorial integrity and include both Ukraine and European states. European Commission spokesperson Paula Pinho said any solution for Ukraine must respect its territorial integrity [45], while spokesperson Christian Wigand said Putin could end the war today if he wanted to and cited the collapsed energy ceasefire as proof Moscow is not seeking peace [47]. Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski likened the proposal to the first Yalta, saying Putin wants Ukrainian territory he could not conquer handed to him as a gift [45]. Polish Defence Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz said he could not imagine any settlement without Ukraine and European states present [46]. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz warned that Russia's goal extends beyond Ukraine to destabilizing Europe's entire political order [11].

China's Foreign Ministry declined to comment on whether Beijing supports the summit, with spokesperson Mao Ning stating she had no information to provide [41]. China separately rejected joining trilateral nuclear disarmament talks with the US and Russia, saying its nuclear strength is not at the same level [6]. Xi Jinping is reported to be balancing continued support for Putin with maintaining China's economic ties with Europe, while Chinese officials are concerned the meeting could overshadow Beijing's APEC agenda [5]. Analyst Yun Sun of the Stimson Center said Beijing wants to be seen as a linchpin among the great powers and a potential mediator between the US and Russia [32][42].

US lawmakers from both parties condemned the administration's Russia moves, with Democratic Senator Chris Coons rejecting any talks about Ukraine's future without Ukraine at the table and accusing Trump of signalling weakness to Xi and Putin [35], while Republican Senator Thom Tillis called the administration's Russia policy capitulation to a dictator [35]. Republican Representative Don Bacon said reducing intelligence sharing and Starlink access to Ukraine equates to aiding the invader [35], and Republican Senator Kevin Cramer warned that concessions to Putin will only invite further demands [35].

Pacific middle powers warned of precedents beyond Ukraine. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the Indo-Pacific is not a chessboard on which superpowers move the pieces, signing a security agreement with Kyiv alongside additional support [38]. Taiwanese coverage read the proposal as a "great-power transaction" and a possible second Yalta that could one day be applied to Taiwan itself [42].

Middle East-based analysis linked the trilateral to the concurrent US-Israeli conflict with Iran. Russian affairs expert Hassan Beheshtipour argued that Russia's leverage is limited and that China should also mediate between Tehran and Washington, saying any three-way meeting should address Iran alongside Ukraine [10]. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov met Iranian officials in Tehran to discuss the US-Israeli war on Iran and regional security [3].

US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are traveling to Norway this week for the next round of negotiations aimed at ending the war in Ukraine, with some sources expecting Zelensky to take part [33]. Zelensky said he discussed next steps in diplomacy with Witkoff and Kushner and stressed that peace comes only through strength and cooperation built on trust [31]. Pope Leo XIV told Zelensky he had asked Putin for a humanitarian ceasefire in Oleshky during a phone call [14].